Crisis Management: What Went Wrong—and Right—During Major Disasters

In every industry, disasters are often the result of human error, failure to follow established protocols, or neglect of critical safety measures. These tragic events can lead to loss of life, environmental damage, and economic devastation. However, history also reveals that well-prepared teams, solid training, and adherence to protocols have the power to prevent or mitigate the worst outcomes in crisis situations. In fact, many of the most catastrophic disasters could have been avoided—or at least significantly minimized—if proper training had been in place or protocols had been followed rigorously. The importance of comprehensive safety procedures, clear guidelines, and leadership during critical moments cannot be overstated. 

Let’s look at both the failures that led to major disasters and the successes where preparation, leadership, and teamwork made the difference between life and death. By reviewing these cases, we can learn valuable lessons about what went wrong in some instances, and what went right in others, to create a roadmap for better disaster management and response in the future.


When Protocols Fail: Disasters Caused by Neglect or Error

Neglecting established guidelines, cutting corners, or misinterpreting critical data often sets the stage for disaster. From the towering flames of Deepwater Horizon to the radioactive fallout of Chernobyl, these tragedies illuminate how human error and oversight can compound into widespread devastation. However, they also highlight the urgent need for robust training, strict adherence to safety measures, and the importance of learning from past failures. By examining these events, we gain insight into how and why protocols faltered—and, most importantly, how to ensure they do not fail again.
 

Several water barges working on putting on a huge fire on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the ocean. Text under image reads: “What resulted from this one incident was an economic, political, scientific, and legal nightmare. It was largely settled when a Federal District judge approved the largest environmental damage settlement in United States history – $20.8 billion – on April 4, 2016.” -National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (photo credit: U.S. Coast Guard)


BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Disaster (2010)

On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded, causing the largest marine oil spill in history. Eleven workers were killed, and 134 million barrels of oil — enough to fill more than 200 Olympic-sized swimming pools – spilled into the ocean over 87 days.

The BP Deepwater Horizon disaster significantly impacted the environment, economy, and public perception of offshore drilling. The millions of gallons of oil severely disrupted coastal communities and their economies, and the ecosystem was devastated: as many as 105,400 sea birds and 167,600 sea turtles died. The region also saw a 51 percent decrease in dolphins. BP faced a record $20.8 billion settlement and increased regulatory scrutiny. The disaster led to the establishment of the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) to enforce stricter safety standards for offshore drilling.

What Went Wrong
  • Inadequate Pressure Testing: Engineers conducted a negative pressure test meant to check the well’s stability, but they misinterpreted results that indicated severe issues. This oversight allowed undetected gas buildup, which eventually led to the explosion.
  • Cost-Cutting Decisions: BP made controversial choices to save time and money, such as reducing the number of centralizers and bypassing critical cement integrity tests. These decisions significantly weakened the well’s structural integrity.
  • Blowout Preventer Failure: The blowout preventer, a critical safety device designed to stop uncontrolled oil and gas release, failed due to poor maintenance, lack of redundancy, and a critical design flaw that rendered it inoperable during the crisis.
Lessons Learned
  • Prioritize Safety Over Cost: Attempts to save money can lead to far more expensive consequences in the long term. Never compromise safety in high-risk industries.
  • Training on Risk Indicators: Workers need thorough training to identify and interpret early warning signs, ensuring timely and decisive action.
  • Regular Maintenance: Workers must inspect and maintain critical equipment frequently, with clear accountability for ensuring functionality.

Abandoned Chernobyl nuclear reactor. Text under image reads: "The nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl 20 years ago this month [April 2006], even more than my launch of perestroika, was perhaps the main cause of the Soviet Union's collapse five years later." - Mikhail Gorbachev, Former Leader, USSR/Russia (1985 - 1991)
Chernobyl Disaster (1986)

On April 26, 1986, Reactor 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Pripyat, Ukraine, exploded during a late-night safety test. The resulting steam explosion and fires released massive amounts of radioactive material – five percent of the reactor core – into the environment. It was one of the worst nuclear incidents in history.

The explosion killed 20 plant workers and firemen within three months after the accident, and approximately 350,000 people were evacuated. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) was diagnosed in 134 people. About 150,000 square kilometers in Belarus, Ukraine, Russia, and beyond were contaminated to varying degrees. At least 1800 individuals who were children at the time of the accident have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer – a much higher number than normal.  The disaster prompted global nuclear safety reforms, including the creation of the World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO)  to promote safety standards and best practices. The event also slowed the expansion of nuclear power worldwide as public confidence in its safety diminished.

What Went Wrong
  • Flawed Reactor Design: The RBMK reactor had a dangerous design flaw: it became unstable at low power levels. This instability, combined with the absence of a containment structure, allowed the explosion to disperse radioactive materials widely.
  • Operator Errors: Operators lacked proper training for the test and violated safety protocols by disabling critical safety systems to simulate a power outage. These actions led to a rapid escalation of the situation.
  • Delayed Crisis Response: Authorities initially downplayed the explosion’s severity, delaying the evacuation of nearby residents. This increased the population’s exposure to harmful radiation.
Lessons Learned
  • Reactor Safety Enhancements: Nuclear reactors must include fail-safes, redundant safety systems, and containment structures to minimize risks.
  • Strict Protocol Adherence: Operators must be rigorously trained to follow safety procedures, especially during high-risk scenarios.
  • Effective Crisis Communication: Timely and transparent communication is critical during emergencies to protect public health and maintain trust.

Golden Ray cargo vessel on its side, undergoing salvage operation. Text under image reads: “You sort of get the sense of a dead, helpless animal laid out there. You see other ships sail past it each day, and you have to wonder, if ships were animate objects, what the ship thinks about its brother laying on its side.” -Doug Haymans, Director, Coastal Resources Division of Georgia Department of Natural Resources (photo credit: Wikipedia user MirtR)


Golden Ray
Capsizes (2019)

The Golden Ray, a 656-feet-long cargo ship carrying over 4,100 vehicles, tipped onto its side and beached itself just off the St. Simons Island shoreline on September 8, 2019. The accident happened just 40 minutes after leaving the Port of Brunswick, Georgia. Luckily, all crew members escaped, though some were trapped inside the ship for a day before being rescued. However, the incident required one of the most complex and expensive salvage operations in maritime history. The Golden Ray remained partially submerged in St. Simons Sound for nearly two years, creating logistical challenges for cleanup and salvage operations. The incident resulted in stricter oversight for ballast management and cargo load stability protocols within the shipping industry. The salvage effort was one of the most complex in maritime history,  and the combined cost of the ship, its cargo, and the removal process cost nearly $1 billion

In addition to the cost of the wreck and cleanup, environmental damage caused by the capsizing and salvage cost nearby fishermen and charter captains much of their livelihood; not only due to the wreck and then salvage efforts blocking the area for two years, but also oil that leaked from the 300,000 gallons of fuel onboard the Golden Ray. Their lawsuit against the owners of the vessel and the group acting as the ship’s agent in the Port of Brunswick was settled , but the exact terms of the agreement were not released.

What Went Wrong
  • Stability Miscalculations: Improperly secured vehicles shifted during transit, causing the ship’s center of gravity to fatally destabilize. Inadequate ballast adjustments further compounded the problem, leaving the vessel vulnerable to rolling.
  • Neglected Safety Checks: Stability tests that could have detected these issues were either skipped or performed inadequately. Key protocols for assessing load balance and weight distribution were ignored, allowing critical errors to go undetected.
  • Communication Gaps: Disjointed communication among the crew hindered an effective response to the unfolding crisis. Language barriers and inconsistent safety briefings may have contributed to confusion during the emergency.
Lessons Learned
  • Emphasize Stability Training: Crews need rigorous training to understand and apply the principles of ship stability and balance. This includes real-world examples of past failures to highlight the importance of proper ballast management and secure cargo loading.
  • Enforce Safety Checks: Pre-departure stability tests should be comprehensive and mandatory, with clear accountability assigned to specific crew members to prevent oversight. Workers must conduct these tests under realistic conditions to ensure they reflect actual voyage scenarios.
  • Streamline Communication: Teams require reliable communication tools and protocols to ensure coordinated action during emergencies. A shared language or translation technology could minimize misunderstandings in high-stress situations.


When Training and Procedures Work: Examples of Disaster Mitigation

In moments of crisis, well-established protocols and effective training are often the unsung heroes that prevent disaster from escalating. Whether managing a nuclear reactor malfunction, coordinating a massive evacuation, or rescuing miners trapped underground, these measures provide the framework for decisive action and collaboration under pressure. When protocols are followed and supported by skilled teams, the impact of emergencies can be mitigated, lives can be safeguarded, and damage can be contained. These examples highlight the power of preparation, showing that even in the most daunting situations, clear guidelines and trained personnel can make all the difference.
 

Two nuclear reactors releasing steam against a blue sky. Text under image reads: "In spite of all the errors and malfunctions, the reactor containment systems at Three Mile Island were extremely stable, they stood up under many shocks and, although the fuel was severely damaged, the reactor vessel and secondary containment appear intact. There never was serious danger of catastrophic failure." G.R. Corey, Former Vice-Chairman, Commonwealth Edison Company


Three Mile Island Nuclear Incident (1979)

On March 28, 1979, a partial meltdown occurred at Reactor 2 of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station in Pennsylvania. While it was the most serious accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant operating history, and some radioactive gas was released a few days after the incident, there were no injuries nor adverse health effects attributed to it. In fact, several major, independent health studies over the years show no evidence of an abnormal number of cancer diagnoses near the plant. Despite the mechanical failures and operator errors that initiated the crisis, effective protocols and rapid actions prevented a catastrophic release of radiation.

However, the incident profoundly altered public perception of nuclear energy in the United States. Public pressure led to the cancellation of numerous nuclear energy projects, effectively stalling the expansion of the industry for decades. Confidence in the safety of nuclear power waned, leading to protests and policy changes. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) implemented stricter operational and safety guidelines, including comprehensive operator training, rigorous maintenance schedules, and enhanced monitoring systems. 

What Went Right
  • Crisis Management Training: Operators utilized their training to stabilize the reactor core, preventing the meltdown from escalating into a larger disaster. This highlighted the importance of pre-emptive training for high-pressure scenarios.
  • Established Emergency Procedures: Teams adhered to safety protocols, including venting steam to relieve pressure, which minimized radiation release. These protocols demonstrated the value of having clear, actionable plans in place.
  • Strong Leadership: Supervisors made critical decisions under immense pressure, balancing risks to personnel and the surrounding community. Their actions underscored the importance of having experienced leaders who can act decisively in emergencies.
Lessons Learned
  • Importance of Regular Drills: Routine simulations helped prepare staff for managing complex emergencies, ensuring quick and effective responses.
  • Advanced Monitoring Systems: The incident highlighted gaps in existing monitoring tools, emphasizing the need for early detection systems to identify and address mechanical issues before they escalate.
  • Regulatory Oversight: The disaster underscored the need for stringent and consistent enforcement of safety standards by regulatory bodies.

“It was an incredible sight … (the explosion) was like a thousand feet high by a thousand feet wide … I will say this about the men, I am proud of them, there was no backing down off this fire, not once. Not one man shirked. When you asked someone to do it, he did it … regardless of the danger.” -Art Warner, Former Deputy Fire Chief 


Mississauga Train Derailment, aka “The Mississauga Miracle” (1979)

A Canadian Pacific freight train carrying hazardous chemicals – including a tanker car carrying 90 tons of chlorine – derailed in Mississauga, Ontario, on November 10, 1979. When the 106-car train went off the tracks, it was speeding along at 80 mph. Fear of a massive explosion led officials to evacuate over 200,000 residents—the largest peacetime evacuation in North America at the time. Despite the scale of the event, there were no fatalities or major injuries, earning the event its “miracle” moniker. No humans were killed or seriously injured, and no pets died; people dropped off house keys at city hall and firefighters opened doors to allow animal shelter workers into homes to feed pets.

The incident prompted significant changes in rail safety regulations across Canada and beyond. Authorities introduced stricter standards for transporting hazardous materials, including improved containment systems and mandatory inspections. The successful evacuation highlighted the importance of comprehensive emergency planning and inter-agency coordination, becoming a model for crisis management worldwide.

What Went Right
  • Quick Decision-Making: Emergency responders acted swiftly, prioritizing public safety by ordering a large-scale evacuation before any explosions occurred. Their rapid assessment of the situation demonstrated the importance of decisive action in emergencies.
  • Collaboration Across Agencies: Firefighters, police, hazmat teams, and government officials worked seamlessly, coordinating resources and expertise to contain the situation. This collaboration highlighted the value of inter-agency communication and joint planning.
  • Adherence to Guidelines: Crews followed established containment and evacuation protocols, preventing the release of hazardous chemicals and ensuring the safety of residents.
Lessons Learned
  • Emergency Planning: Practiced and clear evacuation plans ensured that such a massive operation was executed efficiently, emphasizing the need for preparedness at the community level.
  • Inter-Agency Cooperation: The seamless collaboration of multiple agencies underscored the necessity of shared training and communication protocols.
  • Community Preparedness: Educating residents on evacuation procedures played a critical role in minimizing chaos and ensuring compliance during the emergency.

Rescuers smiling before sending the Fenix capsule down to rescue miners. Text under image reads: “This outcome was the result of an extraordinary cross-industry teaming effort by hundreds of individuals spanning physical, organizational, cultural, geographic, and professional boundaries. Engineers, geologists, drilling specialists, and more came together from different organizations, sectors, and nations to work on the immensely challenging technical problem of locating, reaching, and extracting the trapped miners.” - Amy C. Edmonson, Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management, Harvard Business School
Chilean Mining Collapse (2010)

The San José copper and gold mine in Chile collapsed on August 5, 2010, trapping 33 miners 2,300 feet underground. The monstrous rock blocking the mine entrance weighed over 700,000 tons, “twice the weight of the Empire State Building.” The extreme depth of the mine, number of miners trapped, hardness of the rock, instability of the land, and inadequacy of provisions (enough food for two men for ten days) combined to make the possibility of rescue appear nearly impossible. In fact, early estimates of finding one person alive – let alone 33 – were 10 percent

Thanks to the collaboration and leadership of countless organizations around the world, the mission worked. After drilling an exceptionally long escape tunnel, rescuers slowly lowered and raised a capsule (“Fenix”) that brought the miners back to the surface of the earth, one by one – after 69 days of extreme conditions. The rescue became a global symbol of hope and teamwork, prompting significant improvements in mining safety worldwide. Enhanced regulations for mining operations were introduced, including stricter safety inspections and better emergency preparedness plans. The disaster also underscored the value of international collaboration in tackling complex crises.

What Went Right
  • Strong Crisis Management Training: The miners’ survival skills, including rationing food and water, were instrumental in keeping morale high and ensuring collective survival.
  • Coordinated Response: The Chilean government, international experts, and private companies collaborated to design and execute the rescue operation, demonstrating the power of unified efforts.
  • Effective Communication: Continuous communication between the miners and rescue teams boosted morale and provided critical updates, ensuring cooperation during the rescue.
  • Adherence to Safety Protocols: Rescuers meticulously reinforced the borehole to avoid further collapses, prioritizing safety throughout the operation.
Lessons Learned
  • Crisis Management Training: Workers trained in survival skills can endure extreme conditions until rescue arrives.
  • Innovation Through Collaboration: Coordinating with experts across fields can lead to groundbreaking solutions during crises.
  • Communication as a Lifeline: Maintaining contact with those in danger enhances morale and fosters cooperation.


Key Takeaways: Training and Procedures Save Lives

The devastating consequences of neglect and the transformative power of preparedness offer a clear message: robust training and adherence to protocols are not optional—they are essential. From avoiding preventable disasters to effectively managing crises, the stories of these events highlight the profound difference that foresight, leadership, and a commitment to continuous improvement can make. In this section, we distill the critical lessons learned from these incidents, emphasizing the undeniable importance of safety, preparation, and proactive leadership.

1. The Cost of Neglect

Disasters like the BP oil spill and the Chernobyl explosion demonstrate that neglecting proper training, bypassing protocols, or ignoring early warning signs leads to catastrophic outcomes.

  • Financial Consequences: These events often result in billions of dollars in damages, legal fees, fines, and cleanup costs, alongside long-term economic fallout for the affected industries and communities.
  • Human Toll: Neglect and negligence endanger lives, causing loss of life and severe health effects for survivors, as well as mental health challenges for workers, responders, and community members.
  • Environmental Impact: Beyond human costs, the ecological damage is often irreparable, affecting ecosystems for decades and harming industries like fishing and tourism.
  • Reputation Damage: Organizations that fail to prioritize safety lose public trust and often struggle to recover their credibility, which impacts both market value and future partnerships.
2. The Value of Preparedness

Incidents like Three Mile Island highlight the crucial role of rigorous, scenario-based training and systematic emergency preparedness in effectively managing crises.

  • Training as a Lifeline: Detailed simulations, drills, and continual education ensure that teams can react quickly and confidently when faced with unexpected challenges.
  • Proactive Coordination: Preparedness enables seamless collaboration between agencies and organizations, allowing resources and expertise to be mobilized effectively.
  • Reduced Impact: Proper planning and response protocols limit damage, reduce recovery time, and prevent a manageable situation from escalating into a full-scale disaster.
  • Public Reassurance: Well-prepared teams inspire confidence, ensuring that affected populations feel informed and supported during emergencies.
3. The Importance of Leadership

Strong, decisive leaders who prioritize safety and adhere to established guidelines play a critical role in minimizing damage, as demonstrated in the Mississauga Miracle and the Chilean mine collapse.

  • Decisiveness Under Pressure: Leaders who take swift, informed action during critical moments can prevent chaos and save lives. For example, the quick evacuation in Mississauga averted disaster.
  • Effective Communication: Leaders who provide clear, honest updates during crises foster trust and ensure coordinated efforts across teams and stakeholders.
  • Empathy and Support: Successful leaders understand the human element, offering emotional support to affected individuals while maintaining focus on resolving the crisis.
  • Fostering a Safety Culture: Strong leadership before disasters occur by championing safety, maintaining rigorous oversight, and ensuring resources are allocated to prevent and prepare for emergencies.
4. Continuous Improvement

Every disaster provides an opportunity to evolve safety standards, refine protocols, and strengthen organizational cultures that prioritize safety over expediency.

  • Learning from Failures: Investigating what went wrong helps identify systemic flaws, ensuring they are corrected to prevent recurrence.
  • Advancing Technology: Post-disaster reviews often inspire innovations in safety equipment, monitoring systems, and training methods, as seen with improvements in offshore oil rig technology after Deepwater Horizon.
  • Cultural Change: Continuous improvement requires a shift from a reactive mindset to a proactive one, emphasizing accountability and prioritizing safety at every organizational level.
  • Global Impact: Lessons learned ripple outward, influencing industry standards and inspiring international collaborations to share best practices and improve global safety protocols.

Final Thoughts

These disasters underscore one undeniable truth: the way we prepare for and respond to crises can make the difference between catastrophe and a manageable situation. Whether it’s the lack of proper training or disregard for safety protocols that lead to disaster, or rigorous planning, clear communication, and effective leadership that prevent or mitigate the damage, the role of training, protocols, and procedures in disaster management is critical. As seen in examples like the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster and the Chernobyl explosion, neglecting safety measures and cutting corners can have devastating consequences. However, events like the Chilean mining collapse and the Three Mile Island incident demonstrate that with the right preparation, leadership, and adherence to protocols, even the most life-threatening situations can be resolved with minimal harm. 

Every disaster offers new lessons, and organizations across all industries must commit to constant vigilance, continuous improvement, and a culture that prioritizes safety over expedience. Ensuring that employees are well-trained, that protocols are clear and consistently followed, and that effective leadership is in place can mean the difference between preventing a disaster and facing the unthinkable. By investing in training and creating a culture of preparedness, we not only protect lives but also foster an environment where crisis management is not a reactive, chaotic scramble, but a controlled and effective response that saves lives, livelihoods, and the environment.


Related Blogs

How CrowdStrike’s Faulty Update Became a Worldwide Wake-up Call

The Critical Role of Policies and Procedures in Thriving Companies

How a Disaster Recovery Plan Can Save Your Documents – and Your Company


Resources

“Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident.” NRC.gov. April 2022. Accessed 11/21/24. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/3mile-isle.html 

“Chernobyl Accident 1986.” World Nuclear Association. 4/30/24. Accessed 11/20/24. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/chernobyl-accident 

Corey, G.R. “A Brief Review of the Accident at Three Mile Island.” International Atomic Energy Agency. October 1979. Accessed 11/21/24. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull21-5/21502795459.pdf 

Corrigan, Maureen. “The Incredible Story of Chilean Miners Rescued From The ‘Deep Down Dark.'” NPR. 10/29/14. Accessed 11/21/24. https://www.npr.org/2014/10/29/359839104/the-incredible-story-of-chilean-miners-rescued-from-the-deep-down-dark 

“Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlements: Where the money went.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 4/20/17. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.noaa.gov/explainers/deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-settlements-where-money-went 

Edmonson, Amy C. “How ‘Teaming’ Saved 33 Lives in the Chilean Mining Disaster.” Harvard Business School. 1/29/18. Accessed 11/21/24. https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/how-teaming-saved-33-lives-in-the-chilean-mining-disaster 

“Frequently Asked Chernobyl Questions.” International Atomic Energy Agency. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/chernobyl/faqs 

Gorbachev, Mikhail. “Turning Point at Chernobyl.” Project Syndicate. 4/14/06. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/turning-point-at-chernobyl 

“Last Section of Golden Ray Removed from St. Simons Sound.” 10/25/21. Accessed 11/20/24. https://maritime-executive.com/article/last-section-of-golden-ray-removed-from-st-simons-sound 

Maitland, Geoff. “Deepwater Horizon: As it Happened.” The Chemical Engineer. 3/26/20. Accessed 11/20/14. https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/deepwater-horizon-as-it-happened 

Manaugh, Geoff. “Collapse.” BLDGBLOG.com. 9/30/14. Accessed 11/21/24. https://bldgblog.com/2014/09/collapse 

“Mississauga Train Derailment.” Heritage Mississauga. Accessed 11/21/24. https://heritagemississauga.com/mississauga-train-derailment 

“NTSB Determines Inaccurate Stability Calculations Caused Capsizing of Vehicle Carrier Golden Ray.” NTSB. 9/14/21. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/NR20210914b.aspx 

“Three Mile Island Accident.” World Nuclear Association. 10/11/22. Accessed 11/21/24. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/three-mile-island-accident 

“Total Value of Global Settlement Will Top $20 Billion Largest with a Single Entity in Justice Department History Assures Continued Restoration of the Gulf Coast.” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs. 10/5/15. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-and-five-gulf-states-reach-historic-settlement-bp-resolve-civil-lawsuit-over-deepwater 

“What have been the largest oil spills in U.S. history?” National Ocean Service. Accessed 11/20/24. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial-coastal/oil-spills/os02.html 

Will, Chris. “Seafaring businesses reach settlement with owner, salvage company of Golden Ray cargo ship.” News4Jax.com. 6/24/24. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2024/06/24/seafaring-businesses-reach-settlement-with-owner-salvage-company-of-golden-ray-cargo-ship 

Winston, Andrew. “Five Lessons From the BP Oil Spill.” Harvard Business Review. 6/3/10. Accessed 11/20/24. https://hbr.org/2010/06/the-bp-oil-spill-top-5-lessons 

Wise, Mike. “Mississauga Miracle: Remembering the disaster that forced 240,000 people to flee.” CBC. 11/9/19. Accessed 11/21/24. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/mississauga-miracle-remembering-the-disaster-that-forced-240-000-people-to-flee-1.5354329 

Worley, Sam. “Tracking the long, strange trip of the Golden Ray.” Atlantic Magazine. 4/2/21. Accessed 11/20/24. https://www.atlantamagazine.com/great-reads/tracking-the-long-strange-trip-of-the-golden-ray